Pastor Melissa Scott… I love this story!
May 21, 2009 at 9:08 am 15 comments
This is a crazy story, but I like it. I first became aware of it on the following site before doing my own research into it.
Anna Nicole does… Jesus? Well, sort of. America’s hottest televangelist is Pastor Melissa Scott, who struts her stuff on late night TV, and at the L.A. University Cathedral on Sunday mornings. She’s smart and beautiful, with impossibly long dark curls. No wonder she turned the head of the church’s former pastor, Dr. Gene Scott.
Gene crossed that river Jordan in 2005; Melissa had the keys to the kingdom. Mansions, Kentucky horse ranches, a collection of fancy cars, a private airplane, 24-hour bodyguards — and the church — are all now hers.
via Pastor Melissa Scott.
So I decide to check out http://www.pastormelissascott.com/ which is her official website. This is were it gets interesting. I’ll give you the summary.
Dr. Gene Scott was a televangelist in LA. He had his show on Cable because of his gimmick. He liked using beautiful women (aka porn stars) in his church, the so-called pony girls. They would sit in the front rows of his church, while the regular people had to sit in the back. Not only that, he would have a grand entrance for them, and the audience would have to applaud them as they entered. In addition to the church duties they would also work at Dr. Scott’s personal residence.
Some of these ponygirls are admitted Penthouse girls. But there was one that stood out.
Dr. Scott’s gimmick worked. He was raking in a MILLION DOLLARS A MONTH! Good hard-working Christians were sending him all their money, and he was unashamedly spending it on mansions, porn stars, and more…
Now the twist.
The 70 year old Dr. Scott decides to divorce his wife to marry the now Pastor Melissa Scott, age 40 years younger. She has beautiful long curly hair and… other interesting properties.
Even though she has no theological training, she is ordained by Dr. Scott and starts having a larger role in his church. Unfortunately Dr. Scott dies soon after. He had a medical condition and his new wife insisted on him taking herbs instead of medicine. Some doctors have noted that these herbs may have worsened his condition… but there’s still more.
After Dr. Scott’s death, his widow takes over the church, and it really begins to take off. Super hot, super inspiring… because she has a new gimmick!
It turns out that she is a genius and has just taught herself 20 languages! And she is fluent in all of them. Nevermind that they are all archaic languages of the bible that no one can understand, except for English… she can also write in all of them.
And she has an IQ of 187! Super hot and super smart! Check out this short clip.
Notice all the gibberish on top, and she’s “hoping” she is writing in English now… So anyways, who is Pastor Melissa Scott?
Some Penthouse stars have repeatedly claimed that she is a former porn star. When she married Dr. Scott, she had to get divorced also… from her porn maker husband!
Then on Easter Sunday someone blankets the church with pictures of the Paster, and porn star named “Barbie Bridges” and claims they are the same person. The pastor vehemently denies this. Accuses them of photoshopping and what not. More and more pictures surface… the denial continues. You can do your own research here for those.
Then, in an interview with Marie Claire magazine, she finally admits that she may have partook in some porn starry things…
I will conclude with why I think this is interesting. Besides being a Pretty Woman type scenario, she should have just come clean and say yeah, that was my former life (like porn star Erica Campbell). I’m sure the people would have accepted it, just like they did pageant stars Sarah Palin and Carrie Prejean, and that woman on the 700 club.
But she lied about it. So is she telling the truth about the 20 languages she speaks and writes? Is her IQ really over 180?
I’m pretty sure the answer is no. And this wouldn’t matter so much except that it’s a MILLION dollar a month industry for her! And this money is coming from poor churchgoers who think they are tithing… to GOD! Isn’t that what a tithe is? You give money to God by giving it to the pastor.
It reminds me of the following scene from Don’t Be a Menace:
“The Lord wants you to give generously to his church… don’t ask no questions… don’t ask how come, or why come the pastor has to have him a nice house, or why come the pastor has to have him a nice car… huh… don’t ask… I said don’t ask… I said DON’T ask… no questions… just give the money!”
If this sounds ridiculous, the skit in the movie, or Pastor Scott’s church, let me ask you this question (if you go to church). If you are struggling through these tough economic times, and you are tithing… does your pastor drive a nice car?
Entry filed under: Religulous. Tags: barbie bridges, melissa scott.
15 Comments Add your own
Leave a reply to DAVID Cancel reply
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
MathGeneRation's Weblog 
1.
John | August 11, 2009 at 11:01 pm
You wrote: “Then, in an interview with Marie Claire magazine, she finally admits that she may have partook in some porn starry things…”
That is absolutely false. I challenge you to find a quote by Melissa Scott from that article where she makes such an admission. She most certainly does not.
I don’t know what the real story behind all this gossip, rumor and innuendo is.
But if you’re going to put this out, please get your facts straight.
What exactly is the evidence in the Marie Claire article that goes beyond sketchy?
The author tracked down the alleged ex-husband Pastore, who declined to answer any questions (although his non-answer could be interpreted as confirming the porn rumors); why didn’t she track down some of the legal documents that are supposedly floating around out there, including some apparently very juicy ones relating to the divorce from Pastore?
The author posted an image of an Easter card with a Barbi(e) Bridges picture that was anonymously mailed to members of Scott’s church. If she was somehow able to get ahold of that obscure artifact – of very dubious evidentiary value – why was she not able to obtain more solid documentary evidence?
She quotes Christian Shaw, son of Christine Shaw, a Playboy bunny who is described as a longtime girlfriend of Gene Scott. “She was absolutely Barbie Bridges,” he says. But is there any reason you can think of why this kid might have an ax to grind against the woman who stole Scott’s affections, married him, and inherited his vast estate – leaving Christine and Christian with bupkis? The same could be said of the remarks of another ex-galpal of Scott’s, former Playboy bunny Elke Jeinsen.
Marie Claire is not exactly known for its investigative journalism. And the article’s very snarky tone does not encourage at least this reader’s trust.
That said, I wouldn’t particularly surprise me if the rumors are true. But the Marie Claire piece is a long way from sealing the argument.
2.
mathgeneration | August 12, 2009 at 12:06 pm
“Asked about the Barbie Bridges matter, Scott smacks her berry-stained lips and scoffs. “It’s definitely a freak show. I’ve seen a good portion of the stuff on the Internet, and honestly, I almost have to laugh at it,” she says, flashing the smile again. Pressed further, Scott sighs deeply, then adds, “Okay, I was never an actress in a pornographic movie. So what does that do? You defend that, what else do you start defending?”
That said, Melissa Scott really was a porn star, Though it’s unclear when she adopted the moniker, by 1994 she’d already nabbed a title — Miss Nude CanAm Exotic — under the name. She posed nude, as Barbie Bridges, for Penthouse lensman Earl Miller and famed erotic photographer Suze Randall. At the time, Scott was married to Paul Pastore, who worked for an exotic-dancing agency called Fantasy Creations before launching a porn distribution outfit called Barbie Bridges Enterprises. (Among its titles: Backdoor Diaries and Heidi’s High Heeled Hookers.) “If she doesn’t want to talk about [her past in porn], then I’d rather not talk about it. Whatever she wants to do and say, that’s fine with me,” says Pastore, reached at his West Hollywood office, where he still works in adult entertainment.
Scott didn’t cultivate her relationship with Dr. Scott in church, say former associates, but at his California ranch, where the fiery televangelist frequently entertained nude models like Penthouse Pet Chloe Jones and Playboy Playmate Elke Jeinsen. Congregants dubbed them his “pony girls,” because he often filmed them riding his stallions in thong bikinis and broadcast the footage during televised sermons. (“Now that you see what I got waitin’ for me at home,” he told the audience, “you should all be extra nice to me for comin’ down here to talk to ya.”) “Melissa was there, always dancing for Doc topless, showing her tits right away,” recalls Jeinsen, now a swimsuit model and sometime actress.
Doc often paid his pony girls to attend church, where they acted as a kind of cheerleading squad. “[Melissa] sat in the front row in skimpy outfits. When she came around, I just thought, gold digger,” says Christian Shaw, son of Playboy bunny Christine Shaw, a longtime girlfriend of Doc Scott. He says Melissa’s life in porn was an open secret. “Doc was big on forgiveness, and he wasn’t tripping on her past. She was absolutely Barbie Bridges.” Before long Melissa was singing on Doc Scott’s broadcasts. Then she relaxed her big, curly hair and traded the thigh-high minis for turtlenecks and pantsuits. By the late ’90s, Doc abandoned the pony-girl parties altogether and embraced Melissa as his sole girlfriend.”
via http://www.marieclaire.com/world-reports/news/latest/melissa-scott-porn-pastor
What makes the Marie Claire article is not that they are known for their investigative journalism, it’s that it’s the only interview she has done!
But one fact is that she was married to a man who worked in the exotic services industry and many people have identified her.
But I agree with you. It wouldn’t surprise me either if the rumors are true.
3.
John | August 12, 2009 at 1:13 pm
(1) The Marie Claire article flatly states she was a porn star, but they do not present *any* definitive evidence in support of this proposition, as I explain at some length in my first post on this thread.
(2) Any competent investigator/reporter could have obtained, for example, publicly filed divorce papers/records relating to the alleged marriage to Pastore. However, the Marie Claire reporter offers no such hard evidence.
(3) All of the evidence in the Marie Claire article is either equivocal in import (such as the Xmas card), or from clearly biased sources, i.e., former girlfriends (or the children of former girlfriends) of Gene Scott who were cut out of his will in favor of Melissa Scott.
There is not a single, reasonably neutral third-party witness quoted in the article who states that Melissa Scott acted as a porn star.
(4) You excerpt the Melissa Scott quote in your response. Re-read it. She certainly does not admit to being a porn star. Quite the opposite. She says: “I was never an actress in a pornographic movie.”
(5) At the same time, her attitude seems to be that even being asked to make such a denial is in itself somewhat compromising — rather like being asked the question: “Have you stopped beating your wife?”
(6) In your primary post you state: “Then, in an interview with Marie Claire magazine, she finally admits that she may have partook in some porn starry things.”
That is simply false. She does *not* make such an admission in the Marie Claire article, as noted in point (4).
(7) Do you lack the integrity to revise your initial post accordingly, and remove the false assertion that Melissa Scott “admits that she may have partook in some porn starry things,” when in fact she made no such admission?
Apparently so, as I see you have not revised it.
4.
mathgeneration | August 12, 2009 at 1:39 pm
I’m not here to defend Marie Claire. But I think when you look at all the evidence together, she was clearly a porn star in her previous life.
Her words, put together in the context, led to my words.
The keyword I used was “may”.
The way I interpreted her words, in the context, was more like “at least I haven’t been in porn *movies*.
Put together with all the other facts, ex-husband in the industry, perverted pastor she ends up marrying, people she knows verifying her past, and just look at the pics yourself!
Who was she then? If she was not this porn star, then who was she? Did she miraculously appear out of nowhere. I’m sure people can do some more research, maybe compare SSN or DNA, but that’s beyond what I can do with my resources.
I just think it’s an interesting story. She is a sham, a beautiful sham, and that’s why it works. She is like Palin, or Miss California.
But in the end, I need not revise my “may” statement. May admits uncertainty, and I’m certainly willing to admit that I’m wrong, but I haven’t seen any evidence to the contrary. You yourself said you wouldn’t be surprised…
5.
John | August 13, 2009 at 6:06 am
In your original post you state: “Then, in an interview with Marie Claire magazine, she finally admits that she may have partook in some porn starry things.”
Wrong!
She does *not* admit that she “may” have done “porn starry” things.
Your defense fails because you are imputing the “may” to HER rather than to YOUR INTERPRETATION of her words.
If you want to say: “Based on all the evidence, I think she *may* have done porn,” I don’t have a problem with that.
In fact, if you want to say, “Based on all the evidence, I’m positive she’s done porn,” I wouldn’t have a problem with that, either.
You’re perfectly entitled to your opinion in the matter, to your interpretation of the evidence.
BUT for you to write that “SHE FINALLY ADMITS” she MAY have done porn is simply incorrect. Because that constitutes an assertion of FACT, rather than your mere opinion; and as an assertion of fact it is factually incorrect.
Scott does NOT admit that “she may have done porn.” And it’s dishonest to claim otherwise.
Your further observation that her words COULD BE INTERPRETED to mean she simply denied making porn *movies* but not necessarily ALL forms of pornography, is a POSSIBLE, but by no means the only, and certainly not a necessary interpretation of her words.
1) Thus, in your original post, you cast aspersions on her intelligence (referring to her writing “gibberish,” etc.). Now you suppose that she’s sufficiently whipsmart to make a carefully nuanced Clintonesque denial.
Uh huh. That’s very consistent.
2) Her words are reasonably subject to a more straightforward interpretation, i.e., the interviewer was pressing her about acting in porn movies, and presumably presented “evidence” of the same (e.g., the testimony of Gene Scott’s former porn-film galpals), and *in that context* Scott stated she’d never starred in a porn movie, without intending to imply, or conceal, that she may have done other forms of porn.
(And as noted in my first post, it can be reasonably inferred from the tenor of Scott’s remarks that she’s uncomfortable with being forced to make such a denial – to even have to address the subject – much in the way a man would be made uncomfortable or irritated if he was asked in an interview “Have you stopped beating your wife?” Such a line of questioning would make one uncomfortable and irritated whether or not one had engaged in such activity — indeed, especially if one were innocent.)
3) In any event, in no way can your reading of her remarks be understood as her making an *admission* — which you claim she made.
Thus, if I asked you if you’d stopped slapping your wife around, and you replied “Yes, I’ve stopped slapping her around,” does that mean you’ve ADMITTED that you’re abusing her in some other way, such as putting out cigarettes on her arm?
By no means.
A narrowly framed denial does NOT constitute an admission of activities outside the scope of the denial.
Such a denial MAY be lawyerly in its intent (i.e., Clintonesque), or it may be a plain statement of denying the precise point one was accused of.
Thus:
Officer Friendly: “Did you steal the skateboard?”
Skater Dude: “No sir, I did not steal the skateboard.”
Officer Friendly: “Oh, then, I see you’re admitting to stealing the contents of the cash register!”
Obviously, Officer Friendly’s logic is ridiculous — but that’s merely a reductio ad absurdum of the very same logic that you’ve applied to Scott’s remarks.
And it doesn’t hold water,
6.
mathgeneration | August 13, 2009 at 7:42 am
John, as a mathematician I really due appreciate your use of logic here (seriously). I completely understand what you are saying. But…
Here’s my analogy: You hear a crash. You walk into the room next door and you see a broken lamp and your 4-year old.
Now from a lawyer or “pure truth” point of view, the fact is that you will NEVER know what TRULY happened. The level of uncertainty is such that it cannot ever be known 100% what happened simply because you were not there.
But you can certainly increase your level of certainty as high as possible.
Is this kid known to be a trouble-maker? How about their denial, is it believable? Etc.
I think such is the case with Pastor Scott. I am admitting right now I’m not an expert on this case, but looking at some of the evidence it appears clear what is going on. She is running a scam.
Her response in the Marie Claire article could have been more complete. She admits that as a pastor, a holy woman of God, that she did see some of porn on the web, she thinks it’s funny. Isn’t it a sin to look at porn? How exactly did she examine all this porn?
And she doesn’t fully say “that is not me, I have never had a picture of me taken while nude.” She partially answers the question, which suggests that she MAY have been involved… not with movie porn, but it’s still possible she was involved with image porn, or whatever you would call it.
My use of the word “may” could also mean that she may not have been involved. Hence the uncertainty.
I agree this can be misused here: Sure I may have shot Lincoln… I also may not have… but what do the signs point to?
What do you think? Do you think she was a porn star, or involved with nude imagery in her past? You can still answer with certainty, a yes or no, but I threw in a saver for you… the use of the word “think”. Because in the end we won’t know.
Who can know is the people who were there, and they say she is the former porn star. And of course there’s other pieces of evidence like who her ex-husband was, what her most recent ex-husband did with these beauty stars (hence the connection between her former and current life).
And of course there’s all these pictures of her. I keep studying the evidence, over and over 🙂
Who was she then if not this porn star?
7.
Roy Snider | January 17, 2010 at 4:30 am
I think its obvious that this ‘John’ character is working for, or is melissa scott.
Former employees of Scott have wrote all over the internet about how she went after the tapes of her porn movies and with her lawyers and had averyone of them she could find destroyed.
They say she has a huge team of lawyers scouring the internet constantly for any negative comments about her and they will do everything in their power to have it removed, and have been very successful in doing so.
With the huge anmount of money she is bringing in from her highly unbiblical scam teaching ministry, she can afford to do this and needs to do it in ordfer to keep the scam alive.
As long as we have a society of biblically illiterate individuals, she will continue to rake in the money from them. It’s a sad fact.
8.
Therese Catanzano | January 26, 2010 at 8:23 am
You guys have it all wrong. It doesn’t matter what her past was. All of you who put her down remind me when Jesus says whoever has never sinned throw the first stone.
Pastor Melissa Scott, if you follow her and not look at her superficially, she has been given grace from God to preach the word. I don’t care what you may think. All I know is that I am a better person today, because I follow her and I know what her messages mean.
Stop dwelling on her past, listen to her, and start following her and you may learn what true christianity is.
Take care and God Bless you all,
Therese Catanzano RN
Boston, MA
9.
DAVID | January 28, 2010 at 6:18 pm
HEY watch the comments buddy . . gimmick . . just for money . . this is someone who obviously PROJECTS his own values onto others . . Dr Scott was NOT about making money and USING the Scripture as a “GIMMICK” . .what the . .??? OBVIOUSLY MONEY IS HIS god . . yea I know how these types think . . after all there is no god only the ALMIGHTY DOLLAR and everyone has to get their own anyway one can . . after all in these self-righteous idiots mind there is no blessing no LIVING GOD whose WORD is alive and LIVING. THIS JERK WILL SURELY go to HELL !
TEACHING SCRIPTURE THE WAY IT IS NO GIMICK !
Hey dude I would rather give ALL to a church then anyone else because it is giving it to GOD !
GET A LIFE AND LEARN TO DISCERN THE TRUTH FROM THE BULL THAT YOU PUSH !
My GOD is NOT MONEY ! DUDE !
10.
surfkrow | February 2, 2010 at 6:40 pm
I was a KHOF scince 89′.
(i financialy supported Dr.Scott for 15 yrs and melissa for 5)
I am of the opinion that Dr.Gene Scott set the record straight on many religious issues.
He restored a healthy respect for Christian leadership as well as returning a failing church to faith.
He monopolized the government straight out of the churchs liturgical activity, preached the gospel uncompromised to the whole world
He restored worship to its rightful place and brought communion as a table of grace not guilt into the homes of many.
I have no doubt in my mind that he was Gods man for this hour .
In all fairness i will aknowlwdge that Dr.Scott marchin the “pony girls around was (imho) a major distraction!
Dr.Scott’s own liberty in christ became a liscencious distraction to the proclamation of the gospel (uncompromised by culture and/or traditions)
That being said,
never once in the 20 yrs of following his exegesis did i ever witness anything other than Gods word communicated in the most edifying, spirit filled, God pleasing manner i have ever had the privaledge to behold.
now back to the intent of this post….
To the best of my knowledge pastor mellissa scott (PMS) was entrusted with keeping his voice going.
She was designated “administrative pastor”
meaning her responsability to the best of my knowledge was to preserve Dr.Scotts legacy which should have included perpetuating his voice and his messages.
click on you tube and key in Dr.Scott and all you will discover is the man being made a joke of.
furthermore, key in pastor mellissa scott and you get an entire selection of her own face time passing off Dr.Scotts teachings as her own
(and not doing a very good job of it by the way)
Now i ask,
If she loved the man and the message so much why has’nt she posted DR.Scott himself on this “youtube venue”?
She must be aware of the insults and slander being tossed around Dr.Scott and she has the means to counter balance it.
THIS IS A VERY REVEALING TAKE ON HER INTENTIONS!!
GET RID OF THE COMPETITION!
and so she has….
Back to her responsabilities (as i see it) as “Administrative pastor”.
In no time she brought down Dr.Scotts entire online archive.
At the time of Dr.Scotts passing any and all could freely access Dr.Scotts web page and veiw 30 yrs of his own teachings.
IF HE WANTED HIS ARCHIVE TAKIN OFF LINE HE WOULD HAVE DONE IT HIMSELF!
Also, PMS stopped selling his tapes of which there were a vast many cassett albums and videos . She claimed that she was upgrading to cd etc. in 2/3 yrs scince only a minimul few have resurfaced in cd/dvd form and those along side an equal amount of her own “new and improved messages”.
I suspect that many “oldtimers” like myself were taking there tithes and offerings and spending them on Dr.Scotts cassets and resources available at the time and she put a stop to the “COMPETITION” !! AGAIN!!!!!
Administrative pastor mellissa scott has put herself at the center of attention at the expense of Dr.Scotts legacy and congregation.
(Mellissa, you should have done what you were supposed to do. Now learn a lesson from 1 SAMUEL 13:9-14!!)
Melissa Scotts own words shortly after Dr.Scotts passing were…
“if anyone else had takin over they would have increased and he (Dr. Scott) would have decreased.
I paraphrase but that’s the just of it.
Since then she has moved to the forefront….
LIAR!!!!!
Also, of the handpicked messages that you do get of Dr.Scott, none depict the controversial Domata at his best.
He used to say “send me all the sinners in town you don’t have to change to come to Christ, act in faith and God does the changing for you.”
And that is the proclamation of the Gospel uncompromised by culture and tradition.
Now it reeks of second generation imitation despite the lip service she gives grace.
Dr. Scott railed against the self-rightous and hypocritical church at large and clearly aligned himself against it.
That line has been blurred.
scince Dr.Scotts passing melissa scott has been aligning herself with the likes of paul crouch jr.
NO! She does’nt postulate a properity doctrine as TBN does but nevertheless these cohorts of hers are the same nicolatin charlatins that Dr.Scott himself threw out of the church when he took over Faith broedcast center. WTF???
Dr. Scott once lamented that true teachers of Gods word were treated as outcasts until they died then those that in life were against them would come in and saint them, then steal their messages and stamp their own watered down image on it leaving it seventy ways from Sunday.
Am I not seeing that with my own eyes?
Heres the clincher ,
She does an interview and the question is asked are you barbi bridges, did you ever do porn ?
Her answer is, “ No”.
“If I start defending that then what else do I have to defend?”
That infers shes lying….
Scripture says
“shun the very appearance of evil ” NOT HIDE IT!
And how bout defending
“that the truth of the gosple might continue with you”?
rather than…
“that the lie of cowardice continue with you”
And it was right here after giving her 5 yrs of support in good faith that her intentions were good with respect to Dr.Scotts legacy and Gods alledged “calling” on her life as “administrative pastor” that my dissent crystalized.
Most of the congregation left immediatly after Dr.Scotts passing knowing her for the greedy, power hungry, vain glory, liar that she seemed to be.
I left in Nov. 09′ after she proved them all right.
I gave her 5 yrs to prove herself through her teachings and handling of Dr.Scotts legacy.
as for her teachings i say she is scripturaly sound and consistant with Dr.Scotts own frame of reference and christian pursuasion.
I do not refute that.
What i do refute is her presumption of spirit.
She should have administered Dr.Scotts legacy as it was left.
meaning…
1)maintaining his website as it was.
2)continued selling his resources as it was
3)consistant recognition that she was a steward in charge of Dr.Scotts church and Dr.Scotts congregation.
tithes and offerings collected from Dr.Scotts Congregation should have been distributed as in keeping with Dr.Scotts best intrests for the church and legacy Jesus had bestowed upon him.
All of this is just my opinion and i give it as a 20 yr supporter of Dr.Scotts ministry.
I am entitled to make my own observations about what i see developing sense Dr.Scotts passing.
I make no claim that i have or had an insiders veiw as to the operations of church functions nor do i claim that melissa scott has engaged in fraudulant or criminal activity as recognized by law.
so let there be no misunderstanding as to the intent of my dissent.
My criticism of Melissa Scott is based upon application of Gods word and intent as i percieve it to be as a member of the body of Christ. My dissent is spiritual and based upon spiritual discernment of motive as percieved by her actions and there consequences as they ripple through out the church.
Scripture says a mans gift
(or womans for that matter)
makes room for itself.
well the gift she has presumed to have has led to my resignation from “her” church. And it is “her” church is’nt it.
She made damn sure of that.
Look, I would have had no problem with her proving her calling on her own time and dime.
My problem is that she has done it at Dr.Scotts and his congregations expense!
she should have done what Dr.Scott would have told her to do
“FIND YOURSELF A STREET CORNER AND A SOAP BOX AND PROVE YOUR CALLING!”
THAT YOU HAVE THE GIFT AND UNCTION OF TEACHING TO THE EDIFACATION OF THE BODY OF CHRIST .
THE FRUIT OF WHICH WOULD HAVE CULTIVATED A SEPERATE AND UNIQUE BODY OF BELIVERS TO FOLLOW YOU AS YOU FOLLOW CHRIST
And in doing so Dr.Scotts legacy, congregation and Church would have been a seperate entity from your own.
Word is that now the university cathedral is up for sale.
15 million dollars is the asking price for a building that was bought and paid for.
To the best of my knowledge Dr.Scott saw to it so that this would never happen.
If true, and i strongly belive it is because a poster at afgs revealed a copy of the link and web page making the announcement and intent and amount of sale of the church.
yes it could have been faked and i would suggest any curious seekers to further seek out the truth of the matter.
I was convinced and broken hearted at the same time.
Melissa Scott said (but really Dr.Scott said it when he was alive)
” i’de rather teach a few the right way for the right reasons than many for the wrong reasons.
Well in my opinion and i give it in love.
Melissa Scotts reasoning has been wrong going out the gate as revealed by her actions and that makes her words no matter how true or scriptualy accurate none the less the words of a hypocryt and God does’nt forget for he knows the intentions of the heart.
Going back to the interveiw that Melissa Scott gave…
As far as her saying,
“If i defend that (her alledged porn past)
“what else will i have to defend?”
Could it be that she would have to defend why a porn site under the name of barbie bridges is still up solicting buisness as usual?
hey this is speculation that she has allowed to fester because of her shady response!
Makin money on both sides of the street?
Dr. Scott never backed down from controversy. “Its none of your business what motel I visit” he would say but lie ?
no way …
Dr. Scott was live on the festival of faith.
The man early on put in 3 to 11 hours a day on the festival of faith (Hard WORK!)
As for her maybe 2 hrs on sunday night if that. And she critisizes why attendance is down.
(just smaks of hypocricy)
and this is just one of many reasons.
How about she sucks as a teacher? She may be able to fool the newly gullible and pass of Docs teachn as her own divine revelations but us “OLDTIMERS see through the crap!
And the faithfull are tired of being brow beatin over giving ?
Very vampiric in my opinion.
Dr.Scott spoke to issues of the day you always knew right where he stood on issues from the war in the gulf to televangelists and their ridiculous hypocracy and everything in between.
PMS claims to herald a reformation ,
In my opinion Dr Scott Was the best representative of Christ for this job and was Gods man for this hour.
The proof was in the teaching and that’s virtually gone now thanks to her…
in this age of technology his voice could still be beaming round the world 24/7 any and all used to be able to find his life giving words/messages of Christ but its not any more.
Dr.Scotts congregation would have filled that church to watch Dr.Scott messages on a screen just to perpetuate the importance of the message Dr.Scott proclaimed for Christs sake.
As Dr. Scott used to say “stop at the common sense gestalt” somthins wrong here!!
This PMS syndrome hyjacked the intent of the Domata an left “70 ways from sunday!
At best I think she is deluded at worst just plain evil.
I suspect that SATEN COULDN’T STOP Dr. Scotts voice from goin out to the world so he found a way to compromise it through a woman that seems to have rationalized herself blind into thinking she has an unction so as to justify her own greed and pride.
End result
“Mind numbing deep biblical linquistic exegesis”
AKA
“Teaching to the expense of the life of the spirit”.
And the nicolatin band plays on…….
X khof 49727
Xtither 14130
Xworld band member 60
I redirect any and all to:
leslie hale and joeseph cortes for further instruction in the word.
I would suggest Dr.Scott but you have to go through melissa to get to him. Good luck.
And finaly,
Melissa if you ever read this understand i post here because i have a responsability to speak out not just to you but to those involved directly or indirectly
My heart achs melissa because i watch you and i see glimpses of secerity in your eyes, truth in your words and commitment to your cause.
But thats the thing is’nt it? “your cause”
Oh, i know. “your cause is Gods cause to hear you say it…
Nevertheless!
King Saul had good intentions when he offered up what was clearly samuels and samuels alone to offer.
Im scared for you administrator because when ya live a lie ya belive a lie. And thats a very dangerous place to be cause:
” its a terrible thing to fall into the hands of an angry god”
And if in the end it was i that was mistaken then i pray for your success in Gods work.
Yes i leave that door open for in the end we live and let live, its the christian thing to do.
so go with god but go right?
Melissa i hope i see you over there in Gods bosum for my love runs deep for Gods ministers and i cry as i type this.
we walked a long 5 yr road and it led us to a parting of ways.
Good bye sister
Kevin
11.
KH30,824 | February 3, 2010 at 2:30 am
Yes. .I agree I left too as a result of the usurping of Dr. Scott’s Ministry and calling . . I do NOT think Dr. Scott intended for this to happen to his life’s work . . and he was THE CALLED one . .the “pastoring teacher” . . I do NOT believe PMS is truly called . . she is “administrative pastor” that indicates she is to simply protect and insure God’s prophet’s message stays in tact .. . her “teaching” lacks the “charisma” . .the POWER of the SPIRIT and while going in circles at times . . she can talk all day . .it is VOID . empty words . .she is emulating Dr. Scott at th very best . . . this is a travesty.
For a while there she completely removed Dr. Scott’s teaching and I never even visited the website . .now at the LEAST she has put him on but noticed they are the very early Dr. Scott from the mid to late 70’s early 80’s . . so I have started to watch again when she comes on I depart . . she is NOT CALLED . . she should get out of the way and let GODS PROPHET do the teaching post-mortem . . so I guess she realizes to even a small degree that this TRUTH cannot be denied. If she would smarten up and put Dr. Scott back on full-time she would find his congregation would return.
I do NOT believe he intended for her to align with his enemies and try to imitate him . .she is doing a poor job and copyrights be damned . .it is up to us the King’s Houses to post what teachings we have on the web for the benefit of the rest of us and the world . . to be blessed and enlightened by this true and called teacher . .who went to his reward . . post all you have people .. come on . .this lady needs to get out of the way !
12.
surfkrow | February 3, 2010 at 10:34 am
KH 30824,
boy if all the kings houses rose up and started posting Dr.Scotts teachings on you tube and every where else “copyrights be damned” all hell would break loose !
Melissa and her lawers would be runnin around like chickens with there heads cut off trying to sue us all!
AND IT WOULD RAISE A STINK TO HIGH HEAVEN !
IT WOULD ALSO DEMONSTRATE TO AN ONLOOKING WORLD WHAT A POWER HUNGRY AND VAIN GLORY CHASING CARNAL MINDED PLAGERIZING FARCE SHE REALLY IS.
Can you fathom the irony of a pastor suing her own congregation!????
I WONDER IF THATS EXACTLY WHAT GOD IS WAITING FOR THE FAITHFULL TO DO HMM.
KH 30824 is there a forum other than AFGS for like minded X Kings Houses to discuss these matters that you know of?
In closing,
Im glad you share an affinity for my position in that i suspect there are many likeminded faithfull that need to know there are not alone.
Doc used to say:
“you may have walked away from the church but ya did’nt walk away from God and God certainly has’nt walked away from you”
Time for a return to “first love”
amen? and Praise God 🙂
13.
Cutter2668 | April 26, 2010 at 5:33 pm
KH 54181 here
KINGS HOUSES PLEASE CONTACT ME
WHERE TWO OR MORE OF US ARE GATHERED
STEWARDSHIP WILL BE
14.
surfkrow | February 3, 2010 at 10:45 am
P.S.
KH 30824 i invite you to keep in touch with me.
I belive you can access my email address through this forum and here is a link to my profile page at live video:
http://www.livevideo.com/surfkrow?subtype=1
take care and good day
kevin krow (tampa fl)
15.
Cutter2668 | April 26, 2010 at 5:34 pm
KH 54181
KINGS HOUSES I INVITE YOU TO CONTACT ME
WHERE TWO OR MORE OF US ARE GATHERED
STEWARDSHIP WILL BE
cutter2668@aol.com